Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 08:57:00 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@haven.freebsd.dk>, s223560@studenti.ing.unipi.it, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> Subject: Re: location of bioq lock Message-ID: <8524.1121410620@phk.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:45:24 MDT." <42D75B84.7090601@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <42D75B84.7090601@samsco.org>, Scott Long writes: >I agree. The 'side queue' can be a bioq also that gets handed off in >whole to the driver once the path is unfrozen, but that's an >optimization that is best done at a later time. It's hardly worth the effort I think. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8524.1121410620>