From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep 24 23:37:12 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B7A106566B;
	Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:37:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org)
From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
To: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:37:03 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <201009232220.o8NMK3fX011639@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<201009241711.16129.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
	<20100924172735.6b3910d1@kan.dnsalias.net>
In-Reply-To: <20100924172735.6b3910d1@kan.dnsalias.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201009241937.05173.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@FreeBSD.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>,
	freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: threads/150889: PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER +
	pthread_mutex_destroy () == EINVAL
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:37:12 -0000

On Friday 24 September 2010 05:27 pm, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> If we were to break PTHREAD ABI, we should go all the way and
> make necessary changed to make process-shared locks possible.
> All IMHO.

I agree.

Jung-uk Kim