From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Sep 30 17:57:12 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA11769
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 17:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA11635;
          Mon, 30 Sep 1996 17:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id PAA22110
          ; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 15:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id PAA06515; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 15:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
cc: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi Asami), ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: I'll be away for a while 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 30 Sep 1996 13:31:38 MDT."
             <199609301931.NAA09120@rover.village.org> 
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 15:40:38 -0700
Message-ID: <6513.844123238@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> The OpenBSD people have adopted the FreeBSD port system.  They are
> wondering if they might feed changes to the ports back to the FreeBSD
> tree to make their life easier.  I'll be happy to do the commits,
> should someone be needed to do that, but I wanted to talk things over
> with you for a while before I did any actual commits in this area.

We've talked about this before, and the concensus seemed to be: "Sure,
just so long as it doesn't make our stuff a lot harder to read or
debug and the changes are reasonable ones, e.g. no gross hacks for
working around problems which should be fixed elsewhere."

					Jordan