Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 13 Feb 1999 07:08:38 -0500 (EST)
From:      Howard Goldstein <hgoldste@mpcs.com>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: portability of shm, mmap, pipes and socket IPC
Message-ID:  <14021.27462.556760.465144@penny.south.mpcs.com>
In-Reply-To: <199902122345.QAA26318@usr01.primenet.com>
References:  <199902121146.GAA02357@cally.south.mpcs.com> <199902122345.QAA26318@usr01.primenet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert writes:
 > > Realtime signals would help almost as much, perhaps in a more portable
 > > way.  
 > 
 > man setitimer

 'Sir, may I please have some more?'

I use it...I always feel dirty when I have setitimer signal a clumsy
monolith that is itself in many ways like the one that deals with the
aftermath of a select().  More timers, a la posix realtime signals
(p1003B?  I'm sure I'm citing the wrong posix id) would be cleaner,
and would make it easier to write pthreaded applications.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14021.27462.556760.465144>