Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 02:32:53 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Library numbers in LIB_DEPENDS considered harmful (Re: recent portrevision bump for libvpx) Message-ID: <1329561173881-5495053.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <4F3EEA43.3070808@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F3E2CED.90601@FreeBSD.org> <20120217115441.Horde.mJZLe5jmRSRPPjHxZRgRf2k@webmail.leidinger.net> <4F3E3537.9040105@FreeBSD.org> <1329478316415-5492205.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F3E5D41.9050503@aldan.algebra.com> <CAGsORuBjScOG3V1BykyELtqQhvzk-mKELoVrdUEfOk3Zh4X56w@mail.gmail.com> <4F3EBF4F.6010401@aldan.algebra.com> <CAGsORuDeENz7fWe7pg0=udfcSP-nxN_q8=0agD40gO9fwGCZPA@mail.gmail.com> <4F3EE5A1.80407@aldan.algebra.com> <4F3EEA43.3070808@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It's obviously a matter of trade-off, and I'm with Mikhail on this one, but in the end it all depends how well tested/maintained those ports would be. But it's not like that all ports upon bumping shlib version are tested now, are they? If not, then it's moot point. bes regards, - Jakub Lach -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/recent-portrevision-bump-for-libvpx-tp5492060p5495053.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1329561173881-5495053.post>