From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Feb 18 10:32:58 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E0D106564A
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:32:58 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl)
Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F22B8FC12
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:32:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com)
	by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl>) id 1Ryhb3-0002uV-Se
	for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 02:32:53 -0800
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 02:32:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <1329561173881-5495053.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F3EEA43.3070808@FreeBSD.org>
References: <4F3E2CED.90601@FreeBSD.org>
	<20120217115441.Horde.mJZLe5jmRSRPPjHxZRgRf2k@webmail.leidinger.net>
	<4F3E3537.9040105@FreeBSD.org>
	<1329478316415-5492205.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<4F3E5D41.9050503@aldan.algebra.com>
	<CAGsORuBjScOG3V1BykyELtqQhvzk-mKELoVrdUEfOk3Zh4X56w@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F3EBF4F.6010401@aldan.algebra.com>
	<CAGsORuDeENz7fWe7pg0=udfcSP-nxN_q8=0agD40gO9fwGCZPA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F3EE5A1.80407@aldan.algebra.com> <4F3EEA43.3070808@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Library numbers in LIB_DEPENDS considered harmful (Re: recent
 portrevision bump for libvpx)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:32:58 -0000

It's obviously a matter of trade-off, and I'm with 
Mikhail on this one, but in the end it all depends
how well tested/maintained those ports would 
be. But it's not like that all ports upon bumping
shlib version are tested now, are they? If not, 
then it's moot point.

bes regards, 
- Jakub Lach

--
View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/recent-portrevision-bump-for-libvpx-tp5492060p5495053.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.