Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:09:14 +0400 From: "Igor B. Bykhalo" <goshik@binep.ac.ru> To: "Doug Poland" <doug@polands.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make install port question across nfs Message-ID: <021a01c3030d$61d7d9e0$ea2ce9c1@binep.ac.ru> References: <1593.172.16.1.33.1050370775.squirrel@email.polands.org> <200304141856.34264.kstewart@owt.com> <1754.172.16.1.33.1050372895.squirrel@email.polands.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[...] > > > That's how I do it too. A pwd in a directory like > /usr/ports/sysutils/apcupsd shows the same on all > machines. > > Just for grins I tried a make clean ; make; make > install on one of the slow boxes. When I did a > make install on the other slow box then it > "worked", i.e., it installed the port. So why > is a make on one machine recognized and not > another? Strange to a mere mortal like me. Something like <YourPort>/work/.install_done ? I mean, if you did make install on master machine, then you should *force* install on slaves with network mounted dirs. HTH, Igor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?021a01c3030d$61d7d9e0$ea2ce9c1>