From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 23:03:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2FD8106564A for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 23:03:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (77-93-215-190.static.masterinter.net [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B8D8FC12 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 23:03:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF369CB1B7; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:02:59 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y11odaw7I2qi; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:02:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29B09CB298; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:02:52 +0100 (CET) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n09N2qS2038191; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:02:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:02:52 +0100 From: Roman Divacky To: Alexander Churanov Message-ID: <20090109230252.GA37323@freebsd.org> References: <20090108233311.GA69883@keltia.freenix.fr> <20090109031147.GB44317@duncan.reilly.home> <49672189.5060109@gmx.de> <20090109110508.GA12123@freebsd.org> <496751D1.20605@gmx.de> <20090109134725.GA38233@freebsd.org> <49675F04.20006@gmx.de> <3cb459ed0901091412o5861ec59web9b48d264ca053b@mail.gmail.com> <20090109222211.GA33145@freebsd.org> <3cb459ed0901091453i2144419fyede5894ae411a259@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3cb459ed0901091453i2144419fyede5894ae411a259@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Andrew Reilly , Ollivier Robert , Christoph Mallon , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:03:10 -0000 On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 01:53:56AM +0300, Alexander Churanov wrote: > Roman, > > > > > clang (clang.llvm.org) supports almost everything now and aims for full > > C99 > > support. > > > > pcc aims for full C99 too I believe > > > > Chris Mallon can comment better but I believe cparser is C99 too > > > > am I missing something? > > > This means that I am missing something and that '-pedantic' is all the more > important. well.... clang DEFINITELY aims to be drop-in replacement for gcc, ie. it supports (aims to support) all the gcc extensions hence no -pedantic needed to be compatible with gcc and clang at the same time pcc discusses this now (http://pcc.ludd.ltu.se/jira/browse/PCC-18) from what Chris Mallon said I believe it's cparser's goal too to be drop-in replacement for gcc ie. no strong need for -pedantic as far as I can tell :) honestly... we need some of the gnu99 features and it's only a good thing that the alternative compilers support that, I also have a gut feeling that (as it was in the past) some of the gnu99 things might appear in the next C standard