From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 13 09:44:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57336D1D for ; Tue, 13 May 2014 09:44:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.dlink.ua (smtp.dlink.ua [193.138.187.146]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F0322B0 for ; Tue, 13 May 2014 09:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from terran (unknown [192.168.99.1]) (Authenticated sender: ray) by smtp.dlink.ua (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9E6D3C4927; Tue, 13 May 2014 12:44:31 +0300 (EEST) Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 12:44:42 +0300 From: Aleksandr Rybalko To: George Mitchell Subject: Re: RFT vidcontrol for vt(4) Message-Id: <20140513124442.93f533228108f2672b6237c1@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <53715E79.2040408@m5p.com> References: <20140311162743.072870a9afd4f74fff9e99e8@ddteam.net> <5370CE34.8000905@orange.fr> <20140512171415.558dbcb68971d1db675ea39e@ddteam.net> <5370E47E.7030304@orange.fr> <5370E800.8040803@freebsd.org> <53715E79.2040408@m5p.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 09:44:34 -0000 On Mon, 12 May 2014 19:51:21 -0400 George Mitchell wrote: > On 05/12/14 11:25, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > [...] > > > > Is there any reason not to have kbdmux be mandatory at this point? > > [...] > > Does this mean mandatory in the sense that the kbdmux driver always > gets built and loaded, or that the kbdmux driver must always be in > operation (treating all keyboard-like devices as a single unified > source of keystrokes)? I could live with the first, but there are > definitely times that I want multiple independent keyboards on a > system to be considered unrelated to one another. -- George kbdmux able to manage keyboard set, so you can attach and detach some keyboards. (But I did not test it long ago for vt(4)) > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Thanks! WBW -- Aleksandr Rybalko