From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Sep 15 17:44:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from pop3-3.enteract.com (pop3-3.enteract.com [207.229.143.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A497814FBE for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:44:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ethan@shell-2.enteract.com) Received: (qmail 51920 invoked from network); 16 Sep 1999 00:44:14 -0000 Received: from shell-2.enteract.com (ethan@207.229.143.41) by pop3-3.enteract.com with SMTP; 16 Sep 1999 00:44:14 -0000 Received: (from ethan@localhost) by shell-2.enteract.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA87894; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 19:44:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ethan) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 19:44:06 -0500 From: Ethan Bakshy To: Hubert Feyrer Cc: "Neumann, Matthew C" , Chris Coleman , advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, netbsd-advocacy@NetBSD.ORG, advocacy@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Daemon News Daily Site Message-ID: <19990915194406.A87186@enteract.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i In-Reply-To: ; from Hubert Feyrer on Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 02:18:35AM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Valid point. Maybe the stories should be submitted to daemonnews >as well as /. at the same time (automatically!, through that >page). I'm not sure how that would work, or if slashdot would like that. I don't think rob would be too happy about sharing, since the two sites are sort of competing, and the BSD site is really cutting the BSD stuff that /. doesn't, but /should/ cover. -- ethan "We believe (JavaStation) was basically the right approach, but used some of the wrong technology. We've learned that users don't want to just use Java" -Loiacono, Sun Microsystems To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message