From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 24 16:17:20 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id QAA25598 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 24 Mar 1995 16:17:20 -0800 Received: from sequent.kiae.su (sequent.kiae.su [144.206.136.6]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id QAA25591; Fri, 24 Mar 1995 16:17:14 -0800 Received: by sequent.kiae.su id AA23527 (5.65.kiae-2 ); Sat, 25 Mar 1995 03:03:18 +0300 Received: by sequent.KIAE.su (UUMAIL/2.0); Sat, 25 Mar 95 03:03:17 +0300 Received: (from ache@localhost) by astral.msk.su (8.6.8/8.6.6) id CAA01674; Sat, 25 Mar 1995 02:49:25 +0300 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: hackers@freefall.cdrom.com References: <23938.796086089@freefall.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: <23938.796086089@freefall.cdrom.com>; from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Fri, 24 Mar 1995 15:01:29 -0800 Message-Id: Organization: Olahm Ha-Yetzirah Date: Sat, 25 Mar 1995 02:49:25 +0300 X-Mailer: Mail/@ [v2.32 FreeBSD] From: "Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage" X-Class: Fast Subject: Re: httpd as part of the system. Lines: 31 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1332 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <23938.796086089@freefall.cdrom.com> Jordan K. Hubbard writes: >> Lynx team is resistand about FreeBSD patches, I send all things to >> them several times with no response. >> Jordan, can you (as official FreeBSD speaker) contact with them? >Sure. You have any particular pointers I should follow? lynx-help@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu lynx-bug@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu lynx-dev@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu >> We definitely needs gmake in our gnu tree if we plan to pick up lynx and >> don't want to touch Makefiles without serious needs. >I was actually considering bmaking it. I don't think we should go >down the gmake road quite yet - that much contraversy surrounding the >import would only hinder its progress, and I'm much more interested >in providing the support than I am in debating the gmake vs bmake thing >all over again! OK, it is just different strategy: (1) is bmake all, (2) is don't touch all, when possible. I don't decide which one is better. I think, we can add gmake to gnu tree, but have all stuff bmaked :-) -- Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed, ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead - FidoNet: 2:5020/230.3 : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead. RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849