Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Jun 2020 20:44:04 -0400
From:      Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>
To:        FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Update 11.3 > 11.4
Message-ID:  <CAGBxaXkvj6aMQeQ2mScsB6VsGye-Y+Z7WDp=q48uS6uCZ2vrVg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200617195705.000069f0@seibercom.net>
References:  <20200617134146.00004ce8@seibercom.net> <CAGBxaXmN0wAhZq36H7y7H8f2qnCrjFyos9vPf_em47KCL2TvLA@mail.gmail.com> <20200617165853.000070ca@seibercom.net> <CAGBxaXn-WzZ_J8Ec=FaetqF-p4=dZtWU=b1rgipvs8MD0wsEjA@mail.gmail.com> <20200617195705.000069f0@seibercom.net>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 7:57 PM Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net> wrote:

> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 17:12:27 -0400, Aryeh Friedman commented:
> >Let's see the fact I am typing this reply on "FreeBSD neomarx
> >12.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE-p6 r362146 GENERIC  amd64" with a
> >USB keyboard and mouse via an external hub (and never seen that
> >message) is proof enough it is fixed (with the same BIOS and processor
> >class as reported!).   Don't believe everything you read in bug
> >reports.  Looking through the bug it is clear that it was likely due
> >to a faulty upgrade (or pre-release 12.1) not due to an actual bug.
>
> Are you using it on the exact same PC that the error has been reported
> on? Actually, I believe there are three units. Furthermore, just last
> month I again tried to install 12.1 and it filed immediately with the
> message as depicted in the PC.
>

It was reported on three different BIOS's and motherboards therefore it is
almost certainly not tied to a specific configuration (the only clue is it
on older machines, but even here I have 12.1 working just fine on a machine
that is older than the any the list, I also have it running on newer
machines).   The fact that it is not tied to a specific hardware
configuration means it *SHOULD* appear on any x86 based machine running
12.1.   But, of course that is not true because the above just described
the vast majority of 12.1 machines out there.   Thus we are left with only
one possible conclusion who ever reported it and/or experiences it is
making some kind of user error (what it is who knows!).


> Sorry, but I do not have time to waste on unsubstantiated gossip.
>

Yet you have time to complain about how the FreeBSD community refuses to
get with the times when it comes to MUA's.   I guess your experience here
disproves your claim that "newer is better" in all regards and that "shiny
objects" are more important than functionality.   Perhaps your time is
better spent figuring out what user error you made to trigger the "bug"
that you're complaining about (since it almost certainly is not an actual
bug).


-- 
Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGBxaXkvj6aMQeQ2mScsB6VsGye-Y+Z7WDp=q48uS6uCZ2vrVg>