From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar  4 20:12:10 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB250106564A
	for <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>; Thu,  4 Mar 2010 20:12:10 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mj@feral.com)
Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8D98FC13
	for <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>; Thu,  4 Mar 2010 20:12:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.221.2] (remotevpn [192.168.221.2])
	by ns1.feral.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o24KC9Co049210
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 12:12:10 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mj@feral.com)
Message-ID: <4B901419.8060800@feral.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:12:09 -0800
From: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com>
Organization: Feral Software
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
References: <3bbf2fe11002281655i61a5f0a0if3f381ad0c4a1ef8@mail.gmail.com>	<20100303214424.GA53790@sandvine.com>	<3bbf2fe11003031348q4c1fcccfxd19da32875b43f56@mail.gmail.com>	<4B8EDAE8.3080401@feral.com>	<3bbf2fe11003031357o518d6028m8157d9110a9122f3@mail.gmail.com>	<4B8EF128.8050704@feral.com>	<3bbf2fe11003031532u2207eb55h19c3a045215a7d84@mail.gmail.com>	<4B8EF336.80107@feral.com>	<3bbf2fe11003031547kd5f7314t3d83b2bde06c1c2f@mail.gmail.com>	<4B8EF990.5030407@feral.com>
	<3bbf2fe11003031607wa3727b5ke89bc2a909d4d6a6@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe11003031607wa3727b5ke89bc2a909d4d6a6@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender DNS name whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3
	(ns1.feral.com [192.168.221.1]);
	Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:12:10 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: How is supposed to be protected the units list?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mj@feral.com
List-Id: SCSI subsystem <freebsd-scsi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:12:10 -0000

The referred to patch at least got me out of panic case :-)..


http://people.freebsd.org/~mjacob/scsi_da.c.patch