Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:44:31 -0700
From:      "Jeff Mohler" <speedtoys.racing@gmail.com>
To:        fbsd2@a1poweruser.com
Cc:        "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: 10Mbps versus 100Mbps Cable Modems
Message-ID:  <a969fbd10707110944l3d3c4b1fr2f2637578f77f786@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <NBECLJEKGLBKHHFFANMBAEMCCEAA.fbsd2@a1poweruser.com>
References:  <NBECLJEKGLBKHHFFANMBAEMCCEAA.fbsd2@a1poweruser.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Do you have more than 10Mbit/sec of cable internet bandwidth available?

I dont see it as a problem if you dont, but if you have 20Mbit/sec of
internet, then ya..

If it saves then $5 a unit, for 10,000 units, no harm.

On 7/11/07, fbsd2 <fbsd2@a1poweruser.com> wrote:
>
> Comclark cable in Angeles City Philippines has changed
> from using 100Mbps Cable Modem to 10Mbps Cable Modem.
> To me this seems to be all wrong as all I see is slower response.
> Is there any technical or performance reason for any cable internet
> provider to downgrade their network subscribers cable modems
> from 100Mbps to 10Mbps?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a969fbd10707110944l3d3c4b1fr2f2637578f77f786>