Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:44:31 -0700 From: "Jeff Mohler" <speedtoys.racing@gmail.com> To: fbsd2@a1poweruser.com Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 10Mbps versus 100Mbps Cable Modems Message-ID: <a969fbd10707110944l3d3c4b1fr2f2637578f77f786@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <NBECLJEKGLBKHHFFANMBAEMCCEAA.fbsd2@a1poweruser.com> References: <NBECLJEKGLBKHHFFANMBAEMCCEAA.fbsd2@a1poweruser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Do you have more than 10Mbit/sec of cable internet bandwidth available? I dont see it as a problem if you dont, but if you have 20Mbit/sec of internet, then ya.. If it saves then $5 a unit, for 10,000 units, no harm. On 7/11/07, fbsd2 <fbsd2@a1poweruser.com> wrote: > > Comclark cable in Angeles City Philippines has changed > from using 100Mbps Cable Modem to 10Mbps Cable Modem. > To me this seems to be all wrong as all I see is slower response. > Is there any technical or performance reason for any cable internet > provider to downgrade their network subscribers cable modems > from 100Mbps to 10Mbps? > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a969fbd10707110944l3d3c4b1fr2f2637578f77f786>