Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 14:36:27 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com> To: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> Cc: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Threads in the base system Message-ID: <3A2EBF6B.90BA100B@cup.hp.com> References: <200012062200.eB6M01t07697@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian Somers wrote: > > I've already cast my vote, and can't see any strong argument not to > remove NOLIBC_R (especially now that it breaks world :-) I think Daniel just gave a good reason: we may need it in the future. Isn't it better at this time to keep the NOLIBC_R, but to promote it to an internal tweak? -- Marcel Moolenaar mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org tel: (408) 447-4222 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A2EBF6B.90BA100B>