From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 02:32:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93B716A402; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:32:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from mrout3.yahoo.com (mrout3.yahoo.com [216.145.54.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC9013C44B; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:32:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from minion.local.neville-neil.com (proxy8.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.48.13]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id l3P2LfrE077962; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:21:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:51:39 +0900 Message-ID: From: gnn@FreeBSD.org To: "Simon L. Nielsen" In-Reply-To: <20070424174324.GA1011@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <20070424155910.266924509A@ptavv.es.net> <200704241847.13056.max@love2party.net> <20070424174324.GA1011@zaphod.nitro.dk> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.0.95 (i386-apple-darwin8.8.2) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Max Laier , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet6 in6.h in6_proto.c route6.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:32:14 -0000 At Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:43:25 +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > > > Can you "MTC" this so we can turn off and on RH0 processing on current > > > systems? It would greatly simplify things for me if I didn't have to > > > build two kernels and move back and forth to test things. > > > > +1 ... also is this going to be in the supported RELENG_X_Y branches as > > well? > > Yes, once the foodwork required is done. You'll still have to build two kernels, it is just off by default completely in HEAD. The IETF is currently discussing retiring the option in which case the code will disappear completely from HEAD. Do you really think the option is required in HEAD? Best, George