From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu May 28 11:53:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA27176 for freebsd-hardware-outgoing; Thu, 28 May 1998 11:53:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pobox.com ([208.141.230.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA27130 for ; Thu, 28 May 1998 11:53:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alk@pobox.com) Received: (from alk@localhost) by pobox.com (8.8.8/8.7.3) id NAA03017; Thu, 28 May 1998 13:54:38 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 13:54:38 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199805281854.NAA03017@pobox.com> From: Tony Kimball MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Face: O9M"E%K;(f-Go/XDxL+pCxI5*gr[=FN@Y`cl1.Tn Reply-To: alk@pobox.com To: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: VP3 supports UDMA? X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 20.3 "Vatican City" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I want to buy a new K6-2, but in order to get 100MHz I/O, I would have to abandon Intel chipsets (and hence PIIX3) assuming that UDMA is supported only for PIIX3, this seems to indicate a dilemma: UDMA vs. 100MHz. Is this in fact the case? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message