Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:45:48 +0200
From:      Michael Gmelin <freebsdusb@bindone.de>
To:        "Paul B. Mahol" <onemda@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: New patchset for acpi_wmi/acpi_hp
Message-ID:  <4A4A5D5C.3000400@bindone.de>
In-Reply-To: <3a142e750906301122j792fb80qeb07783cbf8ea1c2@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <4A48DEB8.1040808@bindone.de>	 <83012DEA-D524-49CA-A8D2-6B03E69C4ED5@freebsd.org>	 <4A49E411.1060509@bindone.de> <3a142e750906301122j792fb80qeb07783cbf8ea1c2@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> On 6/30/09, Michael Gmelin <freebsdusb@bindone.de> wrote:
>> Rui Paulo wrote:
>>> On 29 Jun 2009, at 16:33, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> please find attached more patches against CURRENT of today. These
>>>> patches include the patches I've sent on the 27th.
> 
> Everything points they do not.
> 
>>> Committed, thanks.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Rui Paulo
>>>
>> cool thanks, this should be pretty stable and clean enough so I don't
>> expect any changes besides adding supported hardware to the man page in
>> the near future (keeping my fingers crossed :)
>>
> 
> For some reason patches used for this commit do not have anywhere "verbose"
> sysctl in code, and cat /dev/hpcmi doesnt work for me using code from CURRENT.
> Better side of story is that acpica no longer complains about DTD.
> 
> 
> Sorry, I really should noticed and reported this much before ...
> 
Damnit, you're right. Don't know what actually happened.

Sorry Rui, can you help me out?

Thanks
Michael




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A4A5D5C.3000400>