From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Feb 25 14:19:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from Stalker.alfacom.net (Stalker2.Alfacom.net [212.26.133.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C414637B67D for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 14:19:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vkushnir@Alfacom.net) Received: from kushnir1.kiev.ua (dup-60.alfacom.net [62.244.36.60]) by Stalker.alfacom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA00894 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 00:19:38 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (volodya@localhost) by kushnir1.kiev.ua (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1PMJZd75918 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 00:19:36 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from volodya@kushnir1.kiev.ua) Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 00:19:35 +0200 (EET) From: Vladimir Kushnir Reply-To: Vladimir Kushnir To: Subject: Linux binaries run faster under native ?! Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi all, What could be a reason for such a strange behaviour? I've tried a program (some calculations in FORTRAN) as a natove binary and as a Linux binary. Compiled right here, with g77 from linux_devtools port. Result: it takes ~410s as a FreeBSD binary and ~310s as a Linux one. Compiler/linker flags were all the same, in both cases compiled as static. Any clues? Regards, Vladimir -- ===========================|======================= Vladimir Kushnir | vkushnir@Alfacom.net | Powered by FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message