From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov 24 22:51:44 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB3A16A407
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:51:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B2C43D62
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:50:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18])
	by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAOMpfmt088243;
	Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:51:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27])
	by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id kAOMpfv6012738
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:51:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <200611242251.kAOMpfv6012738@lava.sentex.ca>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:51:47 -0500
To: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <20061124210305.GA49228@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
References: <4557FF7A.8020704@samsco.org>
	<200611132054.kADKsFvK045726@lava.sentex.ca>
	<4558E3DC.6080800@samsco.org>
	<200611200454.kAK4sdat083568@lava.sentex.ca>
	<7.1.0.9.0.20061120160757.14d4a728@sentex.net>
	<200611220247.kAM2l9JP095066@lava.sentex.ca>
	<20061122130947.GM20405@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
	<200611231652.kANGqJsr005016@lava.sentex.ca>
	<1164356894.4306.1.camel@massimo.datacode.it>
	<200611242027.kAOKRYZg012113@lava.sentex.ca>
	<20061124210305.GA49228@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Massimo Lusetti <massimo@cedoc.mo.it>,
	Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>
Subject: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE
  patch
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:51:44 -0000

At 04:03 PM 11/24/2006, Divacky Roman wrote:

>I see generic_bzero/bcopy used quite often. why dont you define
>cpu             I586_CPU
>in your kernel config?

Hi,

I cvsup'd to todays kernel and re-ran some of the tests, controlling 
for CPU defs in the kernel.  Posted at http://www.tancsa.com/blast.html

Statistically, I think the results are too close to say they are different.

         ---Mike