Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:28:35 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
To:        Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Multiple (same) sets of man pages
Message-ID:  <200304231828.h3NISZh4074641@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304231351310.1203-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
References:  <20030423133153.A35731@espresso.bsdmike.org> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304231351310.1203-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:08:40 -0400 (EDT), Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> said:

> Right, but there may be extensions in some that aren't in the
> others.  So those would be library-specific man pages.  Like
> pthread_switch_{add,delete}_np() that I believe is only supported
> in libc_r.  I have no plans on supporting it in libpthread
> since it really doesn't make sense there.  There will also be
> other functions available in libpthread that aren't in libc_r
> (and perhaps libthr).

Not a doc person, nor a threads person, but I would suggest that there
should be a single set of manual pages, and for each interface which
differs, the appropriate manual page itself should set out the
differences among the libraries.

-GAWollman



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304231828.h3NISZh4074641>