Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 11:12:58 +0100 From: Lothar Braun <mail@lobraun.de> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Emacs vs XEmacs: which to choose for plain console using? Message-ID: <200701041113.02172.mail@lobraun.de> In-Reply-To: <200701041105.38404.mail@lobraun.de> References: <20070103194157.GA34860@host.my.domain> <200701041105.38404.mail@lobraun.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1831551.kEB2P73iyh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 04 January 2007 11:05, Lothar Braun wrote: > But in your case you only have the possibility to use emacs. Only emacs is > able to work on the plain console. Uh. I have to correct myself: emacs -nw will start emacs on the console. So you can use both editors. Regards, Lothar --nextPart1831551.kEB2P73iyh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFnNMuOlpYSeF9JmYRAv+eAKDkbtsek5qGzE2VfFWlNNUQ49ZyaACfUUHG YHsxIW+QsQlDH3fOexwiMiE= =0xBR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1831551.kEB2P73iyh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200701041113.02172.mail>