Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:21:30 +0200 From: Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Olivier Mueller <om-lists-bsd@omx.ch> Subject: Re: subversion / dav_svn_module : Fatal error 'Recurse on a private mutex.' Message-ID: <200905132221.30817.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: <1242235956.5520.2.camel@frosch.omx.ch> References: <1242123058.945.31.camel@ompc.insign.local> <200905121725.31005.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <1242235956.5520.2.camel@frosch.omx.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Olivier, On Wednesday 13 May 2009 19:32:36 Olivier Mueller wrote: > > > ==> /var/log/httpd/httpd-error.log <== > > > Fatal error 'Recurse on a private mutex.' at line 986 in file > > > /usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_mutex.c (errno = 86) [Tue May 12 > > > 11:56:02 2009] [notice] child pid 64353 exit signal Abort trap (6) > > > > > > > > > The only difference between both repositories is the db/format file: > > > > > > diff -r repos/websites/testing/db/format > > > repos/websites/testing2/db/format 1c1 > > > < 4 > > > --- > > > > > > > 3 > > > > > > If format is "3" (subversion "pre-1.6"), everything works fine, but if > > > the format is "4" the DAV/SVN part crashes (while everything remains > > > fine via svn client / svnserve). > > > > this is with the same binary? Meaning there's no Berkeley db library > > differences? > > Yes, the only recent change was a "portupgrade -rvbp subversion". I'm still thinking there's two different (threading|bdb) libraries linked into httpd, but not sure to ask for which ldd...httpd or mod_dav. The db version could be a red herring or that only one of the formats requires this mutex . -- Mel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200905132221.30817.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions>