Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 Nov 2004 22:53:14 +0100
From:      Joan Picanyol <lists-freebsd-current@biaix.org>
To:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: HEADSUP: Filesystem rototiling over
Message-ID:  <20041102215314.GA27822@grummit.biaix.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041102210023.GM10641@sitadelle.com>
References:  <27404.1099146185@critter.freebsd.dk> <4183A771.7080906@liwing.de> <20041102130412.GI10641@sitadelle.com> <20041102122439.J33456@sasami.jurai.net> <20041102174632.GL10641@sitadelle.com> <20041102210023.GM10641@sitadelle.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> [20041102 22:00]:
> The following patch nullifies the previous one, since it does not
> require to add the -c option to mount(8)/umount(8).
> It adds two variables to default/rc.conf :
> 
>     jail_example_mount_enable="NO"
>     jail_example_fstab=""
> 
> When the first one is made true, then rc.d/jail will mount (resp.
> umount) the filesystems described in the file pointed by the second
> one when the jail will be started (resp. stopped).  If the second one
> is left empty, then it will default to "/etc/fstab.${jail}".

Nice :)

> PS:  Once the patch has been successfuly tested by either me or someone
> else, should I send a PR ?

Of course, and make sure someone commits it someday...

qvb
-- 
pica



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041102215314.GA27822>