Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:08:54 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: latest freebsd:11:x86:64 repo and ruby 1.9 -> 2.0 Message-ID: <20141019220854.GH37244@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <544232F7.3060909@FreeBSD.org> References: <544232F7.3060909@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Enx9fNJ0XV5HaWRu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:29:27PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > $ pkg upgrade > > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > > Updating poudriere repository catalogue... > > poudriere repository is up-to-date. > > All repositories are up-to-date. > > Checking for upgrades (24 candidates): 100% > > Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting) > > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > > The following 24 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): >=20 > First, a minor nit: of 0 checked? >=20 > > Installed packages to be REMOVED: > > ruby-1.9.3.547_3,1 > > porttools-1.02 > > newfile-1.0.14_4 > > hub-1.12.2 > > libchk-1.10.3 > > zfs-snapshot-mgmt-20090201_2 >=20 > Then the real problem, I do not want these packages to be removed except = for > ruby-1.9.3.547_3,1. In other words, I want to keep using zfs-snapshot-mg= mt, > libchk, hub and porttools. What should I do? Just accept the upgrade and reinstall them they are there. we need to impro= ve the solver to prevent that. regards, Bapt --Enx9fNJ0XV5HaWRu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlRENnYACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyGPACfQikNLXwK/HZ/v/BjlgjAJSuj Z2gAoKmLp93hyS+hXcGgCah3n/aVTWNX =ceeu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Enx9fNJ0XV5HaWRu--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141019220854.GH37244>