From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Wed Feb 22 03:38:50 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E16CE79EF; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 03:38:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 346081D4B; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 03:38:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C4DE25C; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:38:48 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:38:47 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: "Mikhail T." Cc: Mathieu Arnold , Jan Beich , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Misuse of PORTREVISION (Re: svn commit: r434379 - head/multimedia/x265) Message-ID: <20170222033847.GA613@lonesome.com> References: <20170218210541.82AA915F6@freefall.freebsd.org> <17b5afa1-c0b4-a79e-aea1-d0ae918469e8@aldan.algebra.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 03:38:50 -0000 On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 07:44:41PM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: > On 21.02.2017 19:03, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >Like as said, as soon as you fix portmaster and portupgrade, you can > >stop bumping PORTREVISION. (I say you, as it seems to be important to > >you, so you may want to work on it.) > > Actually, portupgrade already handles this situation -- > even if imperfectly. When upgrading a port to install a > newer shared library-version, it will preserve the old > shared library(ies) for the depending ports to keep > working, if any. > > >But, as long as nobody does that, you will continue to bump PORTREVISION. > > I will, huh? > > -mi Obviously I consider his attitude objectionable. If he continues in this route I will be asking for formal permission to commit the necessary portrevision bumps to his ports over his objection. You may forward this mail to him if you feel appropriate. mcl