Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 18:48:42 +0600 From: "Eugene M. Zheganin" <emz@norma.perm.ru> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/165903: mbuf leak Message-ID: <516AA5AA.1070003@norma.perm.ru> In-Reply-To: <CA%2Bq%2BTcpzeseVSSjsz7VfPPfcWzfXxzMeALb7OVWotwf8mOJCWw@mail.gmail.com> References: <201304111942.r3BJg1Eh085644@freefall.freebsd.org> <CA%2Bq%2BTcruzcJq2vw6sU=atGHMgqw8RrH0jBMcF8a%2B4SYVDh-G-w@mail.gmail.com> <20130412115443.GU76816@glebius.int.ru> <CA%2Bq%2BTcpzeseVSSjsz7VfPPfcWzfXxzMeALb7OVWotwf8mOJCWw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi. On 12.04.2013 20:13, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 01:45:51PM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labb? wrote: >> O> PR closed too soon ? >> >> It isn't closed, it is in patched state. This means that problem >> is considered solve in the head branch, but not in any stable branch. > Ok, thanks for this clarification ! > > More information of my mbuf leak problem now: > > I've got a firewall (FreeBSD 9.0, nanobsd with pf+pfsync, no tunning) in my lab. > Why 9.0 ? Upgrade at least to 9.1-PRERELEASE. 9.0 just doesn't fit to production. Besides mbuf leak - ipsec is also broken in 9.0. Eugene.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?516AA5AA.1070003>