Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Jul 2019 19:07:10 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        haskell@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 236805] [NEW PORT] lang/elm: Delightful language for reliable webapps
Message-ID:  <bug-236805-16154-chHMBnROmK@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-236805-16154@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-236805-16154@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236805

--- Comment #9 from Evilham <contact@evilham.com> ---
Created attachment 205773
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D205773&action=
=3Dedit
lang/elm - 0.19 - poudriere no network needed

Managed to do the job to make this build under poudriere without a need for
network; thanks to arrowd for all the useful pointers.
(Build log for quick reference, URL valid for 30 days:
https://termbin.com/0d73)


As I mentioned over at #haskell-freebsd, there is an interesting question a=
bout
the language versions, e.g. right now it would be useful (though not necess=
ary)
to have both elm 0.18 and elm 0.19, in a few months/years though, when ther=
e is
a new version of elm, we will likely want to be able to install the new one=
 and
0.19 side-by-side, which can prove tricky if the port is just "elm" with
version 0.19.0.

An option would be to do something like what python does: elm018 (old, but
used), elm019 (current), elm${VERSION} (future).

That raises the question of the name for the executables, I'd incline right=
 now
towards having elm for the current version and elm018 for the old one.

If provided guidance I'd be willing to help make that happen in a way that
works out long-term, giving priority to getting the elm019 in shape to be
added.


Then, with so many people having touched this port, there is also the impli=
cit
question of the maintainer metadata, I left it at haskell@FreeBSD.org and
subscribed to the ML as I guess that'd be mostly non controversial.

Thank you in advance for any input you may have!

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-236805-16154-chHMBnROmK>