Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:20:57 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com> To: burningclown@westhost43.westhost.com Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: ksh93 vs. pdksh Message-ID: <20010619132057.B6890@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106191003340.21498-100000@westhost43.westhost.com> References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106191003340.21498-100000@westhost43.westhost.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Jun 19), burningclown@westhost43.westhost.com said: > So now I have -both- pdksh and ksh93 on my system. The thing is, I can't > figure out what starts when I type the command 'ksh.' It -used- to be > pdksh, of course. Maybe it still is. All I know is that when I type 'man > ksh' I get the man page for pdksh; when I type 'man ksh93' I get the man > page for ksh93; when I type 'ksh93' I get 'command not found' and when I > type 'ksh' ... something starts up. To see that a package contains, take a look at the pkg-plist file if you've got the ports tree, or run "pkg_info -L packagename" if you have the package already installed. It looks like pdksh installs /usr/local/bin/ksh, and ksh93 installs /usr/local/bin/ksh93. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@emsphone.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010619132057.B6890>