From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 00:12:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9C916A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:12:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr (lara.cc.fer.hr [161.53.72.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8823843D31 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:12:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.cc.fer.hr [127.0.0.1]) by lara.cc.fer.hr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j080Be6o044783 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 01:11:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Message-ID: <41DF253C.5040705@fer.hr> Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 01:11:40 +0100 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041213) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: MFC wishlist X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 00:12:21 -0000 It's been a while now and (judging from this list at least), people are not complaining about ULE, so maybe (with re@ approval) the fix & supporting infrastructure could be brought to RELENG_5? Also: libpthread & (g)vinum?