Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 07:52:08 +0400 From: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@buffalo.edu> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Christian Brueffer <brueffer@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r208002 - head Message-ID: <AANLkTil8VxmngA5FgCmdztYQmk98hEXJxjjJQSnlDDb-@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4BEB73FF.8040601@buffalo.edu> References: <201005122120.o4CLK4RE026849@svn.freebsd.org> <AANLkTilzq7eRLQb4AnYQRrFJN27BH6ij5Jr8NdIJbaVO@mail.gmail.com> <4BEB73FF.8040601@buffalo.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13 May 2010 07:37, Ken Smith <kensmith@buffalo.edu> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 5/12/10 11:13 PM, pluknet wrote: >> On 13 May 2010 01:20, Christian Brueffer <brueffer@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> Author: brueffer >>> Date: Wed May 12 21:20:04 2010 >>> New Revision: 208002 >>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/208002 >>> >>> Log: >>> =A0Note 8.0-RELEASE. >>> >>> =A0PR: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 143824 >>> =A0Submitted by: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> >>> >>> Modified: >>> =A0head/UPDATING >>> >>> Modified: head/UPDATING >>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> --- head/UPDATING =A0 =A0 =A0 Wed May 12 20:58:08 2010 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(= r208001) >>> +++ head/UPDATING =A0 =A0 =A0 Wed May 12 21:20:04 2010 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(= r208002) >>> @@ -83,6 +83,9 @@ NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD 9. >>> >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0The meanings correspond to the relevant IPv4 variables. >>> >>> +20091125: >>> + =A0 =A0 =A0 8.0-RELEASE. >>> + >>> =A020091113: >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0The default terminal emulation for syscons(4) has been c= hanged >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0from cons25 to xterm on all platforms except pc98. =A0Th= is means >> >> Woops, that should have been committed directly to stable/8, not touchin= g head. >> > > Why should it be added to stable/8 when no other release is noted > there? > No other release is rather not *yet* noted there, I would say, since that's the first one. If you look at the previous stable branches, you''ll find a scheme, where e= ach stable branch has notes about every releases, besides from that branch only= . If that scheme was changed before stable/8, please correct me. --=20 wbr, pluknet
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTil8VxmngA5FgCmdztYQmk98hEXJxjjJQSnlDDb->