From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Mar 20 17:23:54 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6495AF695 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 17:23:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qv1-xf36.google.com (mail-qv1-xf36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f36]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F2nfx6YTKz4mYD for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 17:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: by mail-qv1-xf36.google.com with SMTP id by2so6639812qvb.11 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 10:23:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:mime-version; bh=nsdlcZl7BzkImo+L+EEhfmvt8SviQ3XfdcqJrKuUhDM=; b=kYPuZhwhL8ofAm8dMhXhDGOkzlkEAkkA4LWqJmJh28AYAp7v9zW9yhP6T6FdI6sDeK wW12VfEOzpGjjEzcukb2DSSwI+nujI9tjJpXJoXPd4LoO/b/WUlPBdWnG8zAtmp5TzB2 nNaukFSb5WqdPaaBaBnP5aY7ZTeRITDz0UFTg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:organization:mime-version; bh=nsdlcZl7BzkImo+L+EEhfmvt8SviQ3XfdcqJrKuUhDM=; b=GUjfr+OCuNRjxHcZMxfA13nEzEqU0xtMfiGbhZQmWykHQsU9PZBleACeokYdzpPvbK WjWpzq+csdPEQQ+HouKJyI7HOFzsZIJdlxaXjKwLhFSOjNp9+8caS6+bruvf796T2NlF tKd00HfTT7MJZyM57zLmoOz+Q4b6bCXBcH0sBjcnfL7unb61YDrV50gTHIC14ULKJyUe YWx6400ILVBPirMBDNcJbjDvG5QP8ez6SdrOzbeSHZy0r6GkvbxPyxO69rfC+3vAoY5O Mhn9u3M2DayFAicNR1ARWqQ8oNiMV1UokkoUXozHaR7lASLyepRX/7R6lQZsHKr7I/WS 21qw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532G/HrFyMC0JyCpbuqoY676/6LD/h0mc2YroZ47r0Xqs2zrPfiz KFpMP5az0kWKYCxkG+OAezcoMaWQHAIuOQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzgRfQIwY2oXTOtHB/DoVlZLJJ3TzOaBUMCymeOh/0ivmBeKOxnWpiLmrl+GFQCEZZrKxwV8A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:c27:: with SMTP id a7mr14450046qvd.54.1616261032549; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 10:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-174-109-231-236.nc.res.rr.com. [174.109.231.236]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p8sm6259405qtu.8.2021.03.20.10.23.51 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 20 Mar 2021 10:23:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (zeus.seibercom.net [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F2nft5jfLz1yh9 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 13:23:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 13:23:39 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OS to replace FreeBSD Message-ID: <20210320132339.00004d9a@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20210319101040.00005c35@seibercom.net> <6054BE1B.50706@gmail.com> <20210319130249.000042a1@seibercom.net> Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/I9E2D7Xt/_+h=ENi4L6yv9q"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4F2nfx6YTKz4mYD X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=seibercom.net header.s=google header.b=kYPuZhwh; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::f36 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jerry@seibercom.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.14 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,meta]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[seibercom.net:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[174.109.231.236:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::f36:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[seibercom.net:s=google]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.26)[-0.263]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[seibercom.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::f36:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::f36:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 17:23:54 -0000 --Sig_/I9E2D7Xt/_+h=ENi4L6yv9q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 02:38:49 -0600, @lbutlr stated: >As I understand it, the controller was always broken (returning an >invalid and illegal ID?) it's just that FreeBSD tried to properly >parse that ID and fails. Who know, there are probably security >considerations. I know I do not want my system rusting a errant USB >port considering the security disater that USB is. Can you provide verifiable proof of that statement relating to the know defect in the USB controller? I had a Dell technician online a few minutes ago, and he claimed that there was no such defect known to exist in that unit. If you could provide me verifiable proof that the controller was defective, I could make a case for them to replace it. There counter was that Free BSD created a bug when they moved to version 12.x and it is not Dell's problem to correct it. His statement made sense since versions <=3D 11.x do work correctly. --=20 Jerry --Sig_/I9E2D7Xt/_+h=ENi4L6yv9q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAEBCAAdFiEELeCiu2K+9VmEYYgTgHBP8gv9FXcFAmBWL58ACgkQgHBP8gv9 FXd/SQv9F5YQof9HZmfg5/ahuPnBtMqcv9JJJh4ka7LOyPX5W2UBeLP3zy/lQHrm ZCQvVeWR+RhHJsQh6Maud+R59Tcnec1yuBjNBtrCQ1XtXLdIhzN1qZ2sFVEJYW5e c15YZzpM73XqJAb8POE5HyIoz7A9BuMJB00BgON3uhPVT10CLNHkcVLtOQNjIngQ N6L8amiesgpxecQSpeP6qGqYPw52oTx/QOO+rPM+P4q11KJGH5cGGQK9x+q9lMU9 oWrekfDULbe6Fp11+SDlsPIm1dqhidMCTQCJgLbm2sjKaBwAPh7YrnUDKul6LhEA 7XQDtZSaWWDCWqKAsNDAfBrXgaCtItv5tFz9zY8iyGoFL+RSDdzCM8hQy+atpKZ3 HjSrqWDg8h8GZ2PtBSLAnVRwDCvoKuASM7h4HhP7fciVhsBBQEKBFAJaKmOBCAcz uSPbNK9RuVL8YLaoswCLD30L3xZHKxB8TZh5oMS7dBNi0mLv7veCM3cM1c0Num7t Tkg8Jsp3 =m0g9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/I9E2D7Xt/_+h=ENi4L6yv9q--