Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 22:42:08 +0900 From: Koichiro IWAO <meta@vmeta.jp> To: <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: who is responsible for unmarking a port =?UTF-8?Q?BROKEN=3F?= Message-ID: <977c63bafad9265fc8e98f5f9f99ce1e@vmeta.jp>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have a question that who is responsible for (un)marking a port. Marking a port as broken is portmgr's job. Unmarking their port is maintainer's job even if mismarked. Is this right? portmgr marked net-im/rubygem-termtter BROKEN. I asked portmgr to unmark it because the port actually works with ruby19. The port is marked as BROKEN for more than a year even if it is not actually broken.But portmgr told me to contact respective maintainer. I asked the maintainer in private e-mail but no answer for almost a year. I finally PR'd the issue and it is time to maintainer-timeout. Please do something for the PR. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=176902 -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta <meta@vmeta.jp>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?977c63bafad9265fc8e98f5f9f99ce1e>