From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 13 13:51:14 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E97D8F
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 13:51:14 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from meta@vmeta.jp)
Received: from glory.vmeta.jp (7c293911.i-revonet.jp [124.41.57.17])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D6C633
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 13:51:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ssl.vmeta.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by glory.vmeta.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E5AE55;
 Sat, 13 Apr 2013 22:42:08 +0900 (JST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 22:42:08 +0900
From: Koichiro IWAO <meta@vmeta.jp>
To: <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: who is responsible for unmarking  a port =?UTF-8?Q?BROKEN=3F?=
Message-ID: <977c63bafad9265fc8e98f5f9f99ce1e@vmeta.jp>
X-Sender: meta@vmeta.jp
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.6
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 13:51:14 -0000

I have a question that who is responsible for (un)marking a port.

Marking a port as broken is portmgr's job.
Unmarking their port is maintainer's job even if mismarked. Is this 
right?

portmgr marked net-im/rubygem-termtter BROKEN. I asked portmgr to 
unmark it
because the port actually works with ruby19. The port is marked as 
BROKEN for
more than a year even if it is not actually broken.But portmgr told me 
to
contact respective maintainer.

I asked the maintainer in private e-mail but no answer for almost a 
year.
I finally PR'd the issue and it is time to maintainer-timeout.

Please do something for the PR.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=176902
-- 
`whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w`
meta <meta@vmeta.jp>