Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 19:58:45 -0700 From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> To: Juha Saarinen <juha@saarinen.org> Cc: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>, Andrew Boothman <andrew@cream.org>, "janb@cs.utep.edu" <janb@cs.utep.edu>, "Daniel C. Sobral" <daniel.sobral@tcoip.com.br>, Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com>, Marek Gorka <marek.gorka@tpi.pl>, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.3 and 6G RAM Message-ID: <200107210258.f6L2wkd03277@mass.dis.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 21 Jul 2001 14:51:17 %2B1200." <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107211445360.22037-100000@vimfuego.saarinen.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Seems to me that it's better to go fully 64-bit rather than utilise the
> PAE hack.
"fully 64-bit" meaning what?
PAE has lots of advantages in the right context.
--
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt]
V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200107210258.f6L2wkd03277>