Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 02:50:42 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG, mckusick@mckusick.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Background Fsck Message-ID: <20010405025042.G17723@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <200104050938.f359ctI09858@Magelan.Leidinger.net>; from Alexander@Leidinger.net on Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 11:38:50AM %2B0200 References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010405001328.24669L-100000@fledge.watson.org> <200104050938.f359ctI09858@Magelan.Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> [010405 02:48] wrote: > On 5 Apr, Robert Watson wrote: > > > Another usability question. Was wondering about the possibility of > > multiple background fsck's getting started at a time, et al, possibly due > > to bad behavior by the user. Can the user get shot in the foot in the > > following situations: > > [1-3] > > 4) They shutdown the machine while the background fsck is in progress. I think it's already been explained that a restart is ok. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010405025042.G17723>