Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 23:29:36 +0200 From: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Olli Hauer <ohauer@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/subversion Makefile.common Message-ID: <4DCEF440.8080309@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4DCEEBE3.7010106@FreeBSD.org> References: <201105141740.p4EHela0084366@repoman.freebsd.org> <4DCEEBE3.7010106@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2011-05-14 22:53, Doug Barton wrote: > FWIW I would not have done this bump because it's not on by default. Moreso > because it's not likely that rebuilding subversion is necessary at all (that's > what shared libraries are for after all). > > > On 05/14/2011 10:40, Olli Hauer wrote: >> ohauer 2011-05-14 17:40:47 UTC >> >> FreeBSD ports repository >> >> Modified files: >> devel/subversion Makefile.common >> Log: >> - bump PORTREVISION since serf was updated. >> >> Note: >> serf is not "on" as default, but widly used in combination >> with subversion instead of neon >> >> Revision Changes Path >> 1.45 +2 -2 ports/devel/subversion/Makefile.common >> >> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/devel/subversion/Makefile.common.diff?&r1=1.44&r2=1.45&f=h >> I was self scratching my head bump or not ... The changes between serf 0.3.x and 0.7.2 are some thousands lines of code so I decide to bump after some tests with a cloned 100.000+ files repo.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DCEF440.8080309>