From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 1 03:00:20 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E220516A418 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 03:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DA813C4B6 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 03:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lA12xbCJ094901 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 05:59:37 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nagual.pp.ru; s=default; t=1193885977; bh=wWSKUZ6BQExPRcIOLIQ4ZPXnM05uLMWwayeswSS SHtI=; l=443; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:User-Agent; b=gpkal7 dJ/JcxQO5rjgEp5geuVgRvbT4U9qOqUCPf6hV8gGfsnZjChcd//O85f268VkqTnbB0l d7LM7dni3/DcK8s7dN0BW3Dn3RyJO4LXUeMx7V2M2bf6jms3GWN1wkvQnE0pZJBmHU6 qRJQzHPfG0Wv0lMK2Y8WOP8Q7h3qDYA= Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id lA12xbsC094900 for current@freebsd.org; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 05:59:37 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 05:59:37 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071101025937.GB94332@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: Subject: non-functional backout for review X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:00:21 -0000 Some people complaints that new check in __isctype() is not human readable and requests for backout. Compiler gives almost identical code for old and new excepting non-optimized case where non-human readable one wins. I am a bit tired to change it forth and back, so ask for final consensus here. Old one return (_c < 0 || _c >= 128) ? 0 : New one (requests for backout) return (_c & ~0x7F) ? 0 : -- http://ache.pp.ru/