From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 10 22:02:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2567616A4CE for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:02:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ritamari.vonostingroup.com (ip193-230.digitalrealm.net [216.144.193.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC0943D2D for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:02:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laszlof@tvog.net) Received: from adsl-68-72-248-38.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net ([68.72.248.38] helo=tvog.net) by ritamari.vonostingroup.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1Co7br-0002wT-2b; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:01:59 -0500 Message-ID: <41E2FB7D.4090606@tvog.net> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:02:37 -0500 From: Frank Laszlo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: daniel quinn References: <200501101628.24793.freebsd@danielquinn.org> In-Reply-To: <200501101628.24793.freebsd@danielquinn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ritamari.vonostingroup.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tvog.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: building a package without installing it X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:02:39 -0000 daniel quinn wrote: >is this even possible? a number of google results have informed me that it >isn't, but i'm hoping there's a hack or a work around. essentially, i want >to build the packages on one box, copy them to many boxes and run package_add >there. > >suggestions/comments? > > > FYI, this belongs on -ports. what is wrong with 'make package' ? -Frank