From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jul 30 16:41:13 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A7AB814DF8; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 16:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA77729;
	Fri, 30 Jul 1999 17:41:08 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id RAA85088; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 17:42:57 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199907302342.RAA85088@harmony.village.org>
To: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... 
Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 30 Jul 1999 16:21:35 EDT."
		<Pine.BSF.4.10.9907301619280.6951-100000@janus.syracuse.net> 
References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907301619280.6951-100000@janus.syracuse.net>  
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 17:42:57 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907301619280.6951-100000@janus.syracuse.net> "Brian F. Feldman" writes:
: And how about having
: 	if (securelevel > 3)
: 		return (EPERM);
: in bpf_open()?

There are no security levels > 3.  I'd be happy with > 0.  This is
consistant with the meaning of "raw devices".

Warner





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message