Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:11:59 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bit twiddling question Message-ID: <20170323211159.GA26726@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Forwarded message from Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> ----- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:52:25 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Cc: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bit twiddling question User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 05:46:34PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: (A large chuck removed) > > C11 doesn't have sincos*() or sind*() to make us more incomplete. > I've had a sincos*() implementation for a few years now. You've seen it, and were dissatisfied with it because I combined sin[fl] and cos[fl] kernels into sincos[kl] kernels. (deleted) ----- End forwarded message ----- Whoops. Didn't mean to broadcast this to freebsd-numerics lists as no Copyright statement is attached to code. Oh well. -- Steve 20161221 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbCHE-hONow
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170323211159.GA26726>