Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:32:00 -0500
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: libthr + libtool bump + mysql
Message-ID:  <20060311013200.GA99311@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0603101719g5db4f47cs@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <3aaaa3a0603090943qdcc1128u@mail.gmail.com> <20060309180651.GA94019@xor.obsecurity.org> <3aaaa3a0603091750r67188696w@mail.gmail.com> <20060310020722.GB919@xor.obsecurity.org> <3aaaa3a0603101719g5db4f47cs@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:19:54AM +0000, Chris wrote:

> I understand but it is frustrating that 6.x gets plugged a lot tho
> when the person mentions they are using 5.x, I hope you understand
> that when freebsd is used on a mission critical server then it is good
> to only upgrade when necessary which is usually just for security
> updates and also to wait for a 2nd or 3rd revision of the new major
> version as to help avoid teething problems.  In that manner I am glad
> older versions are supported for security patches for a while after
> release.
>=20
> I wasnt aware ports removed support right away tho so thank you for
> clarifying that for me.
>=20
> what does confuse me now and I am sure others, you have a situation
> where only the most recent release is supported and 6.1 is been
> released shortly before 5.5 if things goto schedule, will both these
> releases be treated as supported by the ports tree?

Yes, see http://www.freebsd.org/ports/ to understand the support
situation.

> and why is 5.5
> been released at all if people should be upgrading to 6.x to remain
> supported?

Indeed, there was debate about whether to do a 5.5 at all since the
developers have essentially stopped working on it, and we really want
to get everyone onto 6.x since it's so much better.  Apart from a
couple of regressions, even 6.0 was a much better release than *any*
of the 5.x series (including 5.5).

Kris

--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEEiiQWry0BWjoQKURAtbXAJ9r6SdwBmM+9ps1RvN3BLA5s/ZnawCdH6Wo
kS7t3ODPcEi8ANTh+TeSSwM=
=zHYP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060311013200.GA99311>