From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 3 00:55:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A051516A401 for ; Thu, 3 May 2007 00:55:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outR.internet-mail-service.net (outR.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EEB13C447 for ; Thu, 3 May 2007 00:55:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from mx0.idiom.com (HELO idiom.com) (216.240.32.160) by out.internet-mail-service.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2007 17:21:22 -0700 Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (nat.ironport.com [63.251.108.100]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2903125B34; Wed, 2 May 2007 17:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <463932E4.7090707@elischer.org> Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 17:55:00 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: youshi10@u.washington.edu References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unix friendly network testbench for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 00:55:02 -0000 youshi10@u.washington.edu wrote: >> I'd go with 4.11 or wait the extra month or so.. > > That's true, but unfortunately... > > a) 7-CURRENT isn't production quality, but it's getting closer all the > time. > b) I need to start work soon, sometime within the next few weeks at the > latest. I should have thought about this earlier, but it was just posed > as a thought to me friday. 4.11 is definitly production quality.. It won't make it into 7.0. I'm pretty sure. WHen 7-x branches this may go into head.. that puts it a feature in 8.0 Why do you want to use 7.0? of course there is always multiple Xen/vmware/whatever machines.