From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 19 22:34:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B022C106566B for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:34:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oloringr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f227.google.com (mail-fx0-f227.google.com [209.85.220.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A318FC14 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:34:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so3811469fxm.3 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:34:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=VONnlArKzE3KOaNjQbZ1LKN/bf6Pi07P7OOUU8MgNtg=; b=DsqKzxYFeQN/IUrNHbOahOU2uq6AfmlxqVJ++8otJFO+CYqzz72CnMEKxVi0Kv6CJq 2YwGTYfcXeLW5LWsSlgY45AYlXEeSdaaIC7ps29aCbe/T0dPTdV6z6hqZCdD3PDS+al+ S6tDsOQLc/Q/Maj7X3jNftioGeIHP5xuxkMMA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=LAX0Xg1SChlYC3DI7nhV0/fTMkNL79Nd1K5VdOnZZklBz9rWgndQM5ZPTZGnMbkVhF RE3fH7vKRlvVCAXiRRuwR2ffctPTYaa2P0tRyWrDqdXiDu1vTNviYaawvoLIbX7G+b7S FzX+xa9rMLeiunhNMksYc9q0Lx1lG1UIYS4VU= Received: by 10.223.92.141 with SMTP id r13mr7015717fam.79.1261262066038; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:34:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from media.localnet (188.4.67.219.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [188.4.67.219]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 18sm6890037fks.4.2009.12.19.14.34.24 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:34:25 -0800 (PST) From: Ed Jobs To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 00:34:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31-ARCH; KDE/4.3.4; i686; ; ) References: <6c51dbb10912190642s43ec0f2bj69047a0d5a0690ae@mail.gmail.com> <200912192126.15581.pieter@degoeje.nl> In-Reply-To: <200912192126.15581.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-Face: %5EDs|At1pm>WE%P0}6)Hi*s, JH2J${69~j)R"Yu'^P9R3#fvi{LmpsCzxvX*38/, kxcUd QVrlS0G,}-ll{||\P]; *'Gz`RTG+dzconmNyDY3rJHBmpEJkFj|; %vZO&~T")='B<; 88~[ Cltx6#}N*E MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1840948.r3PBZqUzKH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200912200034.41904.oloringr@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Any chance ZFS becoming default? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:34:27 -0000 --nextPart1840948.r3PBZqUzKH Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday 19 December 2009 22:26, Pieter de Goeje wrote: > Don't spread FUD please. If you had read the WIKI you would know it talks > about sysinstall support for ZFS, not about removing UFS. i'm sorry if my mail was misleading. we have no idea how it will be=20 implemented. my guess is that both ufs and zfs would be available through=20 sysinstall, but then again, unless we see the final implementation nothing = is=20 sure.=20 On the original topic: zfs does not have the "experimental" tag since 8.0. = it=20 would not be normal to add sysinstall support (and even more setting as=20 default) in a feature that was experimental. So of course it was pushed to 9 =2D-=20 Real programmers don't document. If it was hard to write, it should be hard= to=20 understand. --nextPart1840948.r3PBZqUzKH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkstVQEACgkQBPpdVEWKA320pwCeNbNBm/ymOILhbqAL/X18wBiG FAYAoOuE/OdpWvNxXMOTm2mjYqBJH+Gr =1lKQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1840948.r3PBZqUzKH--