Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 7 Jul 2001 21:19:22 -0400
From:      "Lanny Baron" <lnb@FreeBSDsystems.com>
To:        "'J.Goodleaf'" <john@goodleaf.net>, <stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: Benchmarks from SysAdmin mag
Message-ID:  <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA2489yS0J80eLWJIQHR8vg8KAAAAQAAAAQ0vdBwIm/0iTFAwl73VpPwEAAAAA@FreeBSDsystems.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010708012209.E37CE5C69@clyde.goodleaf.net>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Hi,
It looks very biased but looking at some of the words quickly. They say
one thing and do another. Namely;

"The operating systems were the latest version available from a
commercial distribution and were not recompiled (i.e., everything was
tested right out of the box)."

" On the UNIX-style operating systems, it was necessary to tweak the
kernel slightly to allow the use of so many connections in one process.
"

So the right and left hands no knot each other.

--lanny

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
[mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG] On Behalf Of J.Goodleaf
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 9:22 PM
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Benchmarks from SysAdmin mag


I lack the technical expertise to judge this article fully. Any
thoughts? 
FreeBSD comes out at the bottom, _below_ Win2K.

http://www.samag.com/articles/2001/0107/0107a/0107a.htm 

 -John

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA2489yS0J80eLWJIQHR8vg8KAAAAQAAAAQ0vdBwIm/0iTFAwl73VpPwEAAAAA>