Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 07:31:05 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: Mindaugas <mindaugas77@delfi.lt> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: about kernel and /boot/defaults/loader.conf Message-ID: <20020702063105.GA52324@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> In-Reply-To: <1112664861.20020701211842@delfi.lt> References: <1112664861.20020701211842@delfi.lt>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 09:18:42PM +0200, Mindaugas wrote:
> Shud I recompile kernel (in FreeBSD 4.6) with these options like in
> bsd 4.5 or it is enougnt to make "YES" to all them in
> /boot/defaults/loader.conf
Either should work.
> What is the diference? (kernel or /boot/defaults/loader.conf)
Recompiling the kernel will generate a single kernel image with all
the required functionality built in. Using loader.conf means that
your kernel image has to load some separate kernel objects from the
/modules directory in order to enable the required functionality.
> What is better? (recompile kernel or make "YES" in
> /boot/defaults/loader.conf")
"Better" is a subjective question. What might be "better" for me is
not necessarily "better" for you. Adopt the scientific method. Try
both ways and see which one suits you better.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks
Savill Way
Tel: +44 1628 476614 Marlow
Fax: +44 0870 0522645 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020702063105.GA52324>