Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:54:35 GMT From: John Birrell <jb@FreeBSD.org> To: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: PERFORCE change 131295 for review Message-ID: <200712200654.lBK6sZxA069642@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=131295 Change 131295 by jb@jb_freebsd1 on 2007/12/20 06:54:13 Choose to typedef struct pcpu as pcpu_t rather than cpu_t so that cpu_t can be redefined depening on what we're try to provide compatibility for. There is a case where the OpenSolaris cyclic timer device uses fields in struct pcpu (or their equivalent), but I don't want to soil our pcpu with stuff to make it all opaque to get around the CDDL. Instead I'll just give the cyclic timer device a cpu array of it's own and it turns out I want to refer to that with a cpu_t. (or something like that) Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/dtrace/src/sys/compat/opensolaris/sys/pcpu.h#4 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/dtrace/src/sys/compat/opensolaris/sys/pcpu.h#4 (text+ko) ==== @@ -32,7 +32,9 @@ #include_next <sys/pcpu.h> -typedef struct pcpu cpu_t; +typedef struct pcpu pcpu_t; + +#define cpu_t pcpu_t #define cpu_id pc_cpuid
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200712200654.lBK6sZxA069642>