Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 20:30:08 -0600 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another Phoronix article Message-ID: <AANLkTimObjkqf%2Bp41zCvtY=dOYR%2B9KGbHBaMb_y7B7Hq@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <igasbc$3o8$1@dough.gmane.org> References: <igasbc$3o8$1@dough.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: > In summary: very varied results, some are expected (low parallel write > small IOPS for FreeBSD), some are not (apparently the BSDs have a monopoly > on high-performance gzip :) ). > I think might have read the graph backwards or I'm misinterpreting your statement. The BSD's have a monopoly on low performance gzip meaning they aren't as fast as the Linux counterparts. That's not much a fs benchmark though as it's mostly a cpu bound operation and the various improvements to gcc and other bits allows Linux to clearly beat out the BSD's. -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimObjkqf%2Bp41zCvtY=dOYR%2B9KGbHBaMb_y7B7Hq>