From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 9 02:54:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F58106564A for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2011 02:54:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC8B8FC0A for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2011 02:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so17989056fxm.13 for ; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 18:53:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=yjG0k6UZM8j2ZUCqhKfIIsKj5hvxCoJJ9VqbBfOqY7Q=; b=Sou0Ob4SMeCyL1vCVRANfNO2+u+Fd/iNeQkF33hpsUZEJ530mo9ntpLZd+4ubD2/wP nA4FUnelzUrOEkXZIBLSODY0LYdTdz2lEvtsd4mXGP5fMIpHa1PyquX6NSDBhSryca0s 5BxckrZbLqn+0T3BuKtdlP7/TPJKKPPdogZkI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=JaWmO916rOIcPkA1P4HRHpMDYMZ2vnfpwbfJvePITyz8WCfsZUuBtG297Bus3O4Z5u uhY4uk2SbupkL3cN/5fQMd6G4kIHJEj5dboc7zUQBCtP5/5H510+ILWSN4fyvba8Ghdx QV3K+/q4tXirdUdSUtEX2zBiCYNKy647FDniE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.95.202 with SMTP id e10mr3998964fan.32.1294540208419; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 18:30:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.114.4 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 18:30:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 20:30:08 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Ivan Voras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another Phoronix article X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 02:54:00 -0000 On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > In summary: very varied results, some are expected (low parallel write > small IOPS for FreeBSD), some are not (apparently the BSDs have a monopoly > on high-performance gzip :) ). > I think might have read the graph backwards or I'm misinterpreting your statement. The BSD's have a monopoly on low performance gzip meaning they aren't as fast as the Linux counterparts. That's not much a fs benchmark though as it's mostly a cpu bound operation and the various improvements to gcc and other bits allows Linux to clearly beat out the BSD's. -- Adam Vande More