Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:29:08 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: marino@freebsd.org Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r402352 - head/lang/gcc Message-ID: <20151124122908.GA21620@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5654567C.8000101@marino.st> References: <201511241019.tAOAJMTF049917@repo.freebsd.org> <20151124110152.GA78748@FreeBSD.org> <5654459E.40100@marino.st> <20151124115156.GA3457@FreeBSD.org> <20151124122024.GD76516@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <5654567C.8000101@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:22:20PM +0100, John Marino wrote: > On 11/24/2015 1:20 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > [...] > > And legacy make is still used on 9.x[.] Please terminate sentences properly, thank you. > But this is not fatal on 9.x. All it does is print the comment during > the build, which really isn't bad. and FWIW, I think indented comments > looks much better, but it's obviously subjective. Indented comments look better in C code, where indentation does not carry any semantic difference. FWIW, I also used to like indented comments in Makefiles this way until I realized how horribly wrong it is, felt ashamed of myself, and promised never ever do this again. :-) ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151124122908.GA21620>